22 Comments
author

The answer is that the over 100% effectiveness is carried over to the after life where they can request the difference be credited at rebirth.

Expand full comment

As usual, the health authorities posted an incredibly misleading graph. The y-axis is ΔVE, but we are never actually given the "true" VE. What can actually be learned from their graph? Absolutely nothing. If VE changed by 120% for those 80+, but started at 10%, then it would only be 12%. If VE dropped by 50% in the 18-29 group, and started at 60%, it would now be 30%. The difference in magnitude is stark even though 120% is much more impressive than -50%. The 120% change may be nothing more than a statistical blip (given something like 90-95% of 80+ COVID cases are in the vaccinated, this seems likely!), and the -50% may represent a disturbing trend.

How to lie with statistics 101.

Expand full comment
Dec 19, 2021Liked by AlmostWrong

Hi AW, I highly recommend this interview with Professor Normal Fenton:

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/mathematician-uncovers-disturbing-mortality-data_fIZmA9TjuoGAfip.html

I know you want that data released, I think it wold be a good idea to email the professor and let him know what data you want and why.

I know he's a very good guy (as are his colleagues) but I had never heard him talk before. He's had a lot of success with FOI requests, presumably due to his status. He obviously knows what's going on. ;)

His contact info is here: https://www.normanfenton.com/contact

Hope this helps.

Expand full comment