43 Comments

Great screenshot! It's so obvious, yet, yet... Try showing it to a pro-vaxxer and hear their replies.

Expand full comment
Dec 26, 2021Liked by AlmostWrong

So, what do you think is happening? Are the tests detecting the virus or the vaxx? Are the illnesses and deaths from the virus or from vaxx injury? Joel Smalley's article on New South Wales is illustrative. How is there suddenly a wave of infection in a country that is very closed and has very little to no viral spread in the community? The same thing happening with dramatic effect in Mongolia when they started jabbing people. Incredible.

Expand full comment
Dec 24, 2021Liked by AlmostWrong

Brilliant! It took me ~25 seconds. I stumbled until I read the headline. I think I'll give this to my family as a Christmas present. If they bring this crap up, I'll request they take the test!

Expand full comment
Dec 24, 2021Liked by AlmostWrong

Fabulous Almost Wrong!

Expand full comment
Jan 14, 2022·edited Jan 14, 2022Liked by AlmostWrong

I'm confused. Is the "positive test rate" the fraction of tests that are positive? If so, one would expect that to be closer to being constant than wildly fluctuating, no? Is this post making the point that it is weird that not only is it wildly fluctuating, but also matches the other graphs?

Expand full comment
Jan 3, 2022Liked by AlmostWrong

Would it be difficult to add a 5th or more graphs that show what the real graphs would look like if the jabs were "highly highly" effective? I assume "highly highly" effective is a real number because Mr Faucenstein "the science" uses it: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/flip-flop-follies-facts-fiction-and

What I'm thinking is this might be a simple way to show people what the real graphs would have looked like if the jabs were say 100% effective (no infection, no transmission), 80%, etc. based on real numbers of fully jabbed. Basically, a way for people to graphically see these jabs are not "highly highly" effective.

Expand full comment
Dec 24, 2021Liked by AlmostWrong

Hospitalization rate??

Expand full comment

Well i'm vaccinated but not boosted. I'd guess call casue mortality? or Hospitalization rate?

Expand full comment

This is hilarious, thank you so much. And clearly, a good diagnostic test is potentially problematic and should be screened at the highest bureacratic levels to make sure we don't violate important principles like medical confidentiality, patient-doctor trust and so on. I'll write to my representative to ask when they could listen to my concerns about it.

Expand full comment

bottom right looks like new cases in vaccinated people

Expand full comment

looks like it might be a count of experimental mass gene therapy WuCoof mRNA GMO transfection Jabs

Expand full comment
deletedJan 10, 2022Liked by AlmostWrong
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
deletedDec 24, 2021Liked by AlmostWrong
Comment deleted
Expand full comment